take turns
In the group Timing.
One player acts at a time, going round the table. Everyone else watches, waits and plans for their own turn. Chess and most board games work this way.
In the group Timing.
One player acts at a time, going round the table. Everyone else watches, waits and plans for their own turn. Chess and most board games work this way.
No one has recorded a check on this entry yet.
To add a record or propose a change, sign in with GitHub or sign in with Google.
Each player rolls and moves in order, and the others watch where the piece lands.
Players pick one at a time from a shared row, so each pick changes what the next player sees.
Bids go round the table, each raising or passing in order.
One player pushes while the rest watch and cheer or groan.
Players place or move one piece at a time, answering each other's moves on the map.
Players take spots one at a time, so the order of turns decides who gets the spot they want.
Players add one piece at a time to their patterns, watching what others build.
Each player plays from their hand in order, deciding what to hold for later turns.
Players play one card each in order, and the order of play shapes every trick.
Deals are made on the active player's turn, so everyone else pitches to them.
Players take one card or piece per turn, building sets in front of each other.
Each player lays one tile, and the shared map grows a step at a time.
Each player answers the last one in order, so the chain passes round the table.
Players act in a fixed order without speaking, reading each move for meaning.
Each player proposes one rule change on their turn, and the game shifts with every turn.
Characters speak and act one after another, like scenes in a play.
One player flicks, stacks or throws while everyone else watches.
Players add to the map one at a time, each drawing over what the last one left.
Players move towards the finish in order, so each turn can close the gap or widen it.
Points are scored turn by turn, and the scores rise in step.
Players act in order to knock each other out, and each turn can remove someone.
The team acts one player at a time against the game's threat.
Players take turns adding to a shared goal.
Players act in order while hiding what each of them is really after.
The story grows one turn at a time, each player adding the next part.
Players act in order with nothing to win, and the turns give the play a shape.
Each player pursues a goal they chose, one turn at a time.
Turn by turn, players dodge the one way to lose.
Turns keep coming with no end in sight, and the rhythm itself keeps play alive.
Players take turns in a game nobody can win, and the turns themselves become the point.
Players take turns but mostly work on their own boards, so others' turns matter little.
Players attack in order, and every turn invites a reply.
Players change the board one turn at a time, and others feel it on their next turn.
The team acts in order, each turn building on the last.
Players act in order, each choosing on their turn whether to help or hold back.
Teams take turns, a player from each side in order.
Players act in order, and the traitor hides among ordinary turns.
Turns come by letter, one after another, days apart.
The absent player's turn comes round like anyone else's, carried out by the rules or a deck.
Players take turns acting while the game master answers each one.
Passers-by take turns joining in, one move each.
Turns pass with dice deciding most of what happens.
Each turn brings a roll or draw, and the player decides how to soften it.
Players plan their turns, with a little luck in each one.
Each player thinks through their move in turn, like chess.
Each turn's roll or draw is read as a sign, one player at a time.
Players take turns but try to sense each other's intentions.
Each player rolls in turn and the dice add the next part of the story.
Everything is visible, and players take turns, so every move can be studied.
Players act in order while hiding their cards, and each move hints at what they hold.
Players take turns while hiding who they are, and every turn is a clue.
Each turn gives a clue, and players work out the answer in order.
Players make claims in turn, and each claim can be challenged.
Players learn the rules by trying moves in turn and seeing what happens.
The one who knows gives a hint on their turn, and the others guess in order.
Each turn reveals a little more of the map.
Players act on the modelled system in order and see its response after each turn.
Each stakeholder acts in turn, so every role gets heard.
Players draw on the shared resource one at a time.
Each turn's choice shows its effect a few turns later.
Players test a new rule turn by turn, seeing how it plays.
Players take turns sharing what they noticed afterwards.
Each turn can leave a permanent mark, made in order.
The rules make their point turn by turn as players follow them.
Each turn carries real stakes, taken in order.
Players gain or lose points standing for values, one turn at a time.
Players act out steps of a possible future one turn at a time.
Some moments go round the table in order and others are chosen by everyone at once, as in Werewolf's talk and vote.
The game moves between ordered turns and free-for-all moments.
Turns go in order, each with a clock.
Turns go in order, but each one is a day or a week apart.
Turns go in order, slowed down on purpose.
Turns go in order but get faster as the game goes on.
take turns neither supports nor works against the feeling excited.
take turns neither supports nor works against the feeling clever.
take turns neither supports nor works against the feeling silly.
take turns neither supports nor works against the feeling tense.
take turns neither supports nor works against the feeling together.
take turns neither supports nor works against the feeling sneaky.
take turns neither supports nor works against the feeling lucky.
take turns neither supports nor works against the feeling in charge.
take turns neither supports nor works against the feeling surprised.
take turns supports the feeling thoughtful.
take turns works against the feeling fast.
take turns neither supports nor works against the feeling unfair in a fun way.
take turns supports the feeling careful.
take turns neither supports nor works against the feeling daring.
take turns neither supports nor works against the feeling friendly.
Push your luck in its plainest form: after every roll, keep what you have or risk it for more. Change one number, the bust or the target, and the whole table plays more boldly or more carefully.
Hidden hands turned inside out: you see everyone's cards except your own, so the team depends on a few limited clues. It shows how a limit on talking can become the whole game.
Worker placement at its smallest: taking a spot denies it to the other player. It shows how turn order and denial create decisions even with no luck at all.
A race where what you hold limits what you can do. It shows hand management, and how one flexible card (the wild) changes every decision around it.
No luck and nothing hidden, yet the winner is often settled many moves before the end by a pattern the players can't yet see. It shows why designers add uncertainty to a game that can be solved.
Four hidden roles and one guess: the whole game is reading faces. It shows how little rule a hidden-identity game needs, and how points can give each role a different stake.
One loser, no winner, and almost no choices, yet real tension, carried by a single card that can never pair. It shows how a game can work on feeling more than decision.
Everyone builds the same rows, and holding a card back blocks the others. It shows interaction through a shared board instead of direct attack.
A rule that lets you move again after closing a box turns a simple drawing game into one of sacrifice and long chains. It shows how one rule can create deep strategy.
Each yes-or-no answer narrows where the ships can be. It shows deduction on a hidden map, and how the size of the board sets how much luck there is at the start.
Pure deduction from counted clues. It shows how much information a single answer can carry, and how a guess can be made to learn rather than to win.
Every claim may be false, and calling a lie costs whoever is wrong. It shows how risk on both sides keeps bluffing honest.
On boards with even sides the second player always wins by copying. It shows how symmetry can break a game, and how changing the board fixes it.
Both players write the same letters, so anything you write can help your opponent. It shows how shared pieces create tactics of giving and avoiding.
Placing pieces, then moving them: a second phase keeps a tic-tac-toe-like game from ending in a draw. It shows phases as a design tool.
Every piece placed can complete someone else's circle, so each move weighs your gain against what it gives away, under a 20-second clock. It shows interaction through a shared board, and time as pressure.
Completing the pizza early scores fewer points, so waiting is rewarded. It shows how one scoring rule can turn a simple arithmetic race into a game of pushing your luck.
The rules themselves are what you discover. Players learn by testing guesses against right and wrong, which is how a designer learns what a rule does. The Rulemaker also feels the balance: a rule nobody finds is as dull as one everyone finds at once.
Hidden rules turn every penalty into evidence. It shows how players build a model of a game from feedback alone, and how much frustration a design can carry before it stops being fun.
Changing the rules is the move. It makes visible what every designer does between playtests, and shows that every rule serves someone more than others.
One rule about momentum makes every move depend on the last. It shows how a simple physical constraint creates planning, risk and a track that the players draw themselves.
The board is drawn by the players, and the moves close the board in. It shows how a game can be made of its own map, and how a growing picture can carry the state of a game.
Every move is both an attack and a defence, because the same chain that connects one player blocks the other. It shows how a geometric fact can rule out draws, and how the swap rule balances first-player advantage.
A game about avoiding, not achieving. It shows a misère goal, and a mathematical guarantee: with six dots someone must make a triangle, so the game always ends.
The first player can always win, yet on most bars nobody knows how. It shows the difference between knowing a strategy exists and finding it, which is often where play lives.
Each move can break one game into several smaller games. It shows how a position can be a sum of separate parts, a way of thinking that helps in designing any game with independent areas.
Each move is uncertain until a later moment decides it, and the decision is handed to the opponent. It shows how a game can be built to teach an idea from science, with delayed effects as its main mechanism.
Each move has two meanings: a mark here and an instruction to the other player. It shows how linking small games turns a solved children's game into one that rewards foresight.
Every line drawn changes what can be drawn next, and old moves create new ones through bouncing. It shows how a game's history can live on the board and become its strategy.
A board with a single empty point makes every move a question of who gets stuck. It shows how one restriction, the centre rule, can keep a tiny game from being won at once.
Two sides with different pieces, different moves and different goals. It shows asymmetric design: balance comes from tuning numbers such as goats needed and capture counts, not from giving both sides the same thing.
A game made entirely of chance that still carries a meaning, because every square is labelled. It shows how a board's words can make players read luck as a lesson, and how rules can make an argument.
A race with a shared middle, where luck decides the distance and you decide which piece to risk. It shows how a few special squares, the rosettes, shape the whole flow of a game.
A game whose rules were lost and had to be reconstructed from boards and texts. It shows that any set of rules is a choice, and how a path, a few special squares and a swap rule can carry meaning about a journey.
Every bid is a claim you can't check without risking a die. It shows how bluffing works when information is shared but hidden, and how a game tightens as each loss shrinks what you know.
A small deck carrying many card powers, each answering another. It shows how a designer gives every card a role, builds counters into the rules, and makes a race into a fight.
Trick-taking with a single prize: the tens. It shows how a game can strip a big system down to one thing to fight over, and how partnerships form a silent conversation through the cards played.
A game that looks fair and isn't. It shows how probability can surprise players, and why designers test balance instead of trusting how a rule looks.