abstract
In the group Theme.
No story — just shapes, colours, patterns. Like Chess or Go. The game is the game.
In the group Theme.
No story — just shapes, colours, patterns. Like Chess or Go. The game is the game.
No one has recorded a check on this entry yet.
To add a record or propose a change, sign in with GitHub or sign in with Google.
The abstract theme gives the game no story or setting, just shapes, colours and moves, so the rules are the whole experience.
abstract neither supports nor works against the feeling excited.
abstract supports the feeling clever.
abstract neither supports nor works against the feeling silly.
abstract neither supports nor works against the feeling tense.
abstract neither supports nor works against the feeling together.
abstract neither supports nor works against the feeling sneaky.
abstract neither supports nor works against the feeling lucky.
abstract neither supports nor works against the feeling in charge.
abstract neither supports nor works against the feeling surprised.
abstract neither supports nor works against the feeling thoughtful.
abstract neither supports nor works against the feeling fast.
abstract neither supports nor works against the feeling unfair in a fun way.
abstract neither supports nor works against the feeling careful.
abstract neither supports nor works against the feeling daring.
abstract neither supports nor works against the feeling friendly.
Push your luck in its plainest form: after every roll, keep what you have or risk it for more. Change one number, the bust or the target, and the whole table plays more boldly or more carefully.
Hidden hands turned inside out: you see everyone's cards except your own, so the team depends on a few limited clues. It shows how a limit on talking can become the whole game.
Worker placement at its smallest: taking a spot denies it to the other player. It shows how turn order and denial create decisions even with no luck at all.
Bidding with a budget that never refills: every token spent now is gone later. It shows how players come to price the same prize differently as their money runs down.
Drafting: each card you keep is also a choice about what your neighbour gets. It shows how passing cards along turns every pick into a gift or a block.
A race where what you hold limits what you can do. It shows hand management, and how one flexible card (the wild) changes every decision around it.
No luck and nothing hidden, yet the winner is often settled many moves before the end by a pattern the players can't yet see. It shows why designers add uncertainty to a game that can be solved.
A rule that lets you move again after closing a box turns a simple drawing game into one of sacrifice and long chains. It shows how one rule can create deep strategy.
Pure deduction from counted clues. It shows how much information a single answer can carry, and how a guess can be made to learn rather than to win.
On boards with even sides the second player always wins by copying. It shows how symmetry can break a game, and how changing the board fixes it.
Both players write the same letters, so anything you write can help your opponent. It shows how shared pieces create tactics of giving and avoiding.
Placing pieces, then moving them: a second phase keeps a tic-tac-toe-like game from ending in a draw. It shows phases as a design tool.
Everyone looks at the same cards at once, with no turns, so perception wins over planning. It shows simultaneous play, and how a single matching rule can carry a whole game.
Every piece placed can complete someone else's circle, so each move weighs your gain against what it gives away, under a 20-second clock. It shows interaction through a shared board, and time as pressure.
The rules themselves are what you discover. Players learn by testing guesses against right and wrong, which is how a designer learns what a rule does. The Rulemaker also feels the balance: a rule nobody finds is as dull as one everyone finds at once.
The board is drawn by the players, and the moves close the board in. It shows how a game can be made of its own map, and how a growing picture can carry the state of a game.
Every move is both an attack and a defence, because the same chain that connects one player blocks the other. It shows how a geometric fact can rule out draws, and how the swap rule balances first-player advantage.
A game about avoiding, not achieving. It shows a misère goal, and a mathematical guarantee: with six dots someone must make a triangle, so the game always ends.
The first player can always win, yet on most bars nobody knows how. It shows the difference between knowing a strategy exists and finding it, which is often where play lives.
Each move can break one game into several smaller games. It shows how a position can be a sum of separate parts, a way of thinking that helps in designing any game with independent areas.
Each move has two meanings: a mark here and an instruction to the other player. It shows how linking small games turns a solved children's game into one that rewards foresight.
A board with a single empty point makes every move a question of who gets stuck. It shows how one restriction, the centre rule, can keep a tiny game from being won at once.